M6Bone meeting - 2003/12/16

Sunday December 21st, 2003.
 

People attending (able to transmit video/sound):

-  Netza - UdeG
-  Stig - UNINET
-  Roman - PSNC
-  Sami Keski-Kasari - TUT
-  Luciano - CPQD
-  Jerome - RENATER

Introduction:

Jerome: Remind main goals for the meeting:
-  Share IPv6 multicast experience
-  Tackle faster the connectivity/implementations problems
-  Use the network to be able to improve it
-  Know eachother a bit better :-) Would like we have these meetings every 3 weeks and that these meetings don’t last more than 1 hour.

Presentation of people attending the videoconf:

-  Netza - UdeG - connects several sites/networks in America (UACH, UNAM, CPQD, UdeG, Univ Navojoa, Wichita, NYSERNET...)
-  Stig - UNINETT - connects site in NORDUNET/UNINETT region, connected natively via 6NET
-  Roman - PSNC - connected natively via 6NET
-  Sami Keski-Kasari - TUT - connected behind UNINET
-  Luciano - CPQD - connected behind UdeG
-  Jerome - RENATER - Manages global RP and some tunnels. Natively connected to 6NET core and soon to ETRI in Korea.

New M6Bone maps and MBGP deployment:

Jerome: Core of M6Bone is now an MBGP+PIM SM/SSM network. No more RIPng mesh. Sites can then connect to the POPs on the core. A document describing how to do this will be published on the M6Bone web site. 6NET runs IPv6 multicast, all the NRENs in Europe are interconnected natively for IPv6 multicast.

Netza: Is connected to several networks/sites from a C3725. IPv6 in IPv4 tunnel as he has "bad" IPv6 connectivity. Soon CUDI will be connected to Abilene natively. CPQD - Static Univ of Sonoara - Static UNAM - Static Wichita - Static NYSERNET - BGP RENATER - BGP Had difficulties for connecting the sites. He has now static routes (for unicast and multicast) to connect the sites not able to do MBGP. He has nbow routes for /48 to keep only sites prefixes in the list.

Stig: FUNET and TUC directly connected to NORDUNET now.

Jerome: Remind everyone to take a look at the maps periodically and send the diffs to have maps and site list up to date Maps are the only way to show the activity around IPv6 multicast

Availability of IPv6 multicast in vendors equipments:

Netza & Stig: CISCO
-  Good experience with CISCO
-  No possible to redistribute static multicast routes in MBGP
-  Embedded-RP and BSR tests performed

Jerome: JUNIPER
-  MBGP+static multicast routes
-  No IPv6 in IPv6 tunnels
-  can encapsulate if DR
-  cannot decapsulate if RP (next release). Only works with Null registers at the time
-  no embedded RP (should be here soon)
-  no BSR (doesn’t take it into consideration and doesn’t forward the BSR messages)

Jerome: 6WIND
-  MBGP+static multicast routes
-  Kame daemon slightly tuned to support MRIB
-  Will be soon in CLI in official releases (January)
-  no embedded-RP and BSR configuration possible (will work on it)
-  static RP configuration available

Beacon:

Roman:
-  Some changes on beacon server few days ago.
-  Memory leak on clients, didn’t solve the problem, they don’t know what is the problem (Java virtual machine?)
-  Should be implemented in Mexico (and maybe Brazil) as important POP.
-  Encourage everyone to run the client and use beaconserver.m6bone.net server.

Netza: Will work on it: they will stay in contact.

Stig: Important to keep an eye on the matrix to have it green. Too many problem at that time. We need to deploy it but we have to use the tool.

Open microphone:

Netza: Can’t see Luciano in Brazil but can hear him

Stig: Maybe a MTU problem: vic uses large packets and rat use small packets. When encapsulation, this can cause some problems.

Next meeting:

Jerome: I will send proposals in the ML.

...END...


Reply to this article

Forum